Loss in competitiveness compared to Hungary and Poland: Real effective exchange rate – a critical indicator for Romania
Romania has improved its competitiveness compared to the Czech Republic and Bulgaria at the regional level in recent years but lost ground compared to Croatia,… Mai mult›
Gas extraction from Black Sea will become unprofitable if investment starts after 2022 – ANRM estimate
If delayed long after 2022, the investment in natural gas exploitation in the Romanian commercial area of the Black Sea could become unprofitable. Also, not… Mai mult›
A decade of change in Romanian economy structure: Trade, public sector salaries and IT replace the loss of industry and agriculture contribution to GVA
The structure of Romania’s economy has a number of peculiarities compared to the European average in terms of the contribution brought by major sectors to… Mai mult›
The National Institute of Statistics confirmed the signal result of the economic growth for 2020 at the level of -3.9%, in the first preliminary version… Mai mult›
Romgaz (SNG) will submit an offer to take over ExxonMobil’s participation in the concession for the exploitation of natural gas from Neptun Deep perimeter in… Mai mult›
Lost opportunities: Romanian companies have not capitalized on years with low interest rates. Neither did banks. Causes
de Adrian N Ionescu , 15.1.2018
They considered this opportunity only in the second half of 2016, that is, when it began to fade out.
The revival of the credit appetite occurred, though, as the window of opportunity closed off considerably since September 2017, that is, since the market triggered a new monetary cycle, marked by the new increase trend in interest rates.
Windows of opportunity
The interest rates market returned in 2010 to the levels registered in the pre-crisis period and stabilized over the following three and a half years within a range between 9 and 10 percent, average interest rate on new loans, according to data from the National Bank of Romania (BNR).
The interval of the interest rate stabilization, although relatively broad, confirms the notable decrease in its volatility compared to the first years of the crisis.
- Figure 1: Average interest rate on new loans granted to non-financial companies
The evolution of the market of the interest rates on new loans also justified the increase of the total balance of credits for non-financial companies from RON 98 billion in March 2010 to the historical maximum of September 2012 (RON 121.8 billion, in equivalent).
However, the opportunity from the period 2011-2013 was only partly used. The increase in the volume of credits was the effect of the steps taken to recover the damage caused by the crisis, of restructuring and refinancing older loans, rather than the return of the appetite for financing development.
Thus, most of the loans in lei were on terms shorter than one year. Also, about one-third of total loans in foreign currencies were for less than one year.
In addition, much of the 2012 record balance was also represented by the volume of non-performing loans (included in the BNR statistics). Cleaning up balance sheets by selling them speeded up only in the years that followed, when the volume of corporate loans granted also declined to 99 billion in August 2016.
As of June 2013, the average market interest rate on new loans fell sharply from 9.21% to 6.84% in December 2013, 6.01% in June 2014 and 5.87% in December 2014, with periods of relative stability during this time, as can be seen in Figure 1.
The downward trend in interest rates was, though, as uncertain as it was less seized, as the corporate credit balance declined instead of rising, as can be seen in Figure 2.
When the interest reached the historic minimum level of 3.51%, in September 2016, the balance of credits was RON 99.9 billion, very close to the minimum level of the last six years, registered one month before.
- Figure 2: Loans granted to non-financial companies
It is true, also at that time, banks made a remarkable progress in clearing up balances of bad credit.
The balance of credits granted to companies started to rise only in September 2016, the month when – ironically or not – the inter-bank borrowing rates burst, as the government’s need for money removed the liquidity from the market.
At the same time, BNR had to change its monetary policy outlook, move its focus away from protecting the exchange rate to protecting the interest rate and adjust its inflation target upward. Therefore banks’ expectations are now toward the increase in the monetary policy rate in several steps.
There is also an official certainty: the era of low interest rates is over, and the balance of corporate loans reached only RON 107.3 billion in November 2017, which is only at the level of June 2011 (RON 109 billion).
Why did Romanian companies fail to take advantage of low interest rates?
The interest rate leap of the last quarter of 2017 was aggressive enough to make BNR feel the need to assess the resilience of the economic environment to shocks.
“Preliminary estimates show that the rate of non-performing loans would increase from the current figure of 15.8% to 18.7% in the hypothesis of a 200 basis point interest rate shock,” says the latest BNR report on the financial stability.
However, BNR analysis has identified a lending potential of about RON 113 billion, not used by the approximately 14,300 companies, which could have been qualified according to banks’ regulations and offers, as shown in the latest data of June 2017.
“More than two-thirds of the additional financing may be absorbed by the private sector (69%), while the rest by state-owned companies. Most important amounts could be directed to fields of activity such as manufacturing (26.3%) or services (14.2%) “, says the report on Romania’s financial stability, published by BNR in December.
Causes of failing
Statistically speaking, many of the Romanian companies do not even qualify for loans. That is, they are not bankable, and the first argument from the list of “cons” is that they already have negative own equity. In other words, they already have debts higher than their own funds, including the equity.
On the other hand, neither do the banks try too much to gain too many corporate clients.
On the contrary, banks are happy either with the flow from large multinationals (who do not even need loans from one point forward, because their activity is a big cash-generator) or financing the state.
In its most recent report on financial stability, BNR says that “the main risk factors to financial stability are:
- “(I) sub-capitalization of a significant number of companies (over 276,000 companies have a level of own equity below the level set in regulations, out of which over 268,000 have negative equity).
The sub-capitalization is mainly caused by losses (over 217,000 companies registered losses of RON 33 billion in 2016) and the high indebtedness in certain sectors;
- (ii) the increase of outstanding obligations towards the state budget (+ 5.9% in 2016);
- (iii) the reduced capacity to recover commercial claims, especially at the level of micro-enterprises;
- (iv) the significant number of firms in the portfolio of credit institutions that have not gone through a complete business cycle;
- (v) the insolvency phenomenon resuming an upward trend, both in terms of the number of new firms in insolvency (6,100 in the first eight months of 2017) and the volume of the non-performance in the banking sector (the volume of non-performing loans generated by companies in insolvency increased by about one third, to RON 1 billion) and
- (vi) the increase in the government payment arrears compared to the payment arrears in the real economy (+ 9% between September 2016 and September 2017, to RON 223.1 million), according to the report mentioned.
On the other hand, banks’ lack of interest in attracting and maintaining corporate clients is large enough to trigger specific comments from the BNR Governor.
Mugur Isarescu urged banks, several times over the past year, to pay more attention to the financial education of their clients.