At the end of the first half of the year, the general consolidated budget registered a deficit of about RON 15 billion, an amount… Mai mult›
Between three and five million Romanians work and live abroad. The 2017 UN estimate, rated as optimistic by the World Bank’s Report on Diagnosis of… Mai mult›
In only one quarter: Incomes increased five times faster than GDP. For public sector employees, even faster
Data released by the INS for the first quarter of 2018 show that households’ living standards increased considerably compared to the same quarter of the… Mai mult›
It is the Administrative Code’s turn: little responsibility for local elected officials, higher power for asset disposing, privileges
The Chamber of Deputies votes the amendments to Romania’s Administrative Code on Monday, amendments that strengthen the political control over local administrations. It is expected… Mai mult›
The average gross wage announced by the INS for May 2018 was 4,512 lei, 0.4% lower than in the previous month. Net nominal average wage… Mai mult›
Siegfried Muresan / Why Romania does not have to accept measure of cutting the European funds, as proposed by the European Commission
de Siegfried Muresan , 7.5.2018
The European Union’s 2021-2027 multiannual budget proposal, presented on Wednesday by the European Commission, should not be accepted in this form by the Romanian Government because it provides for a 5% cut in European funds for cohesion policy and the common agricultural policy, the main European policies based on which our country receives European non-reimbursable funds.
But for Romania to be able to impose itself in the European budget negotiations, it must, first, ally with the other member states that benefit from these two policies and persuade the net contributing states.
Secondly, it must show that the funds allocated to our country are being used efficiently, which means to increase the absorption of European funds.
The Commission proposes 5% cuts in European funds for cohesion and agriculture
The European Commission has published yesterday the proposal for the future 2021-2027 multiannual budget of the European Union. In short, the Commission proposes for the European Union to do much more things in the period 2021-2027 with resources that do not reach the expected level.
With this multiannual budget proposal, they seek to balance the lack of budget revenue caused by the UK’s exit from the European Union and the need for additional spending in areas such as security, defence and migration. The UK is a net contributor to the EU budget with annual allocations to the European budget by EUR 12-14 billion more than it receives. The Commission therefore proposes a budget increase to EUR 1.279 billion for the period 2021-2027, accounting for 1.11% of the EU Gross National Income (GNI), compared to 1% now.
The proposal is not a positive one for Romania, as the allocations to the two main European policies benefiting our country, the common agricultural policy and the cohesion policy are reduced by 5%. The news should not come as a surprise to us.
The European Commissioner for Budget and Human Resources, Guenther Oettinger, has repeatedly said that the budget gap following the Brexit will be covered both by an increase in member states’ contributions and budget cuts. Combined with the need to allocate more funds in areas such as security, defense, research or programs such as Erasmus, we have a clearer picture of the Commission’s proposal.
How we can increase EU budget so as not to cut European funds
The cuts proposed by the European Commission are not the only solution to cover the gap left by the UK. I have said even two years ago, when the UK voted to leave the EU, that we can replace its budgetary contributions and cover the need to spend more money in priority areas without affecting traditional EU policies such as agriculture or cohesion. How?
By introducing new budget resources. In the past, there have been several proposals for such new budgetary resources to reduce allocations that governments of member states make to the EU budget. Possible sources of funding are taxes on financial transactions or large corporations, but also environment or fuel taxes, but all these proposals faced the refusal of EU countries, especially since such proposals need unanimity.
Unfortunately, the European Commission has not come up with sufficiently ambitious proposals to meet the EU’s budgetary needs.
We need to think that the diminishing of the cohesion policy moves us away from the EU objective of economic convergence. To be fair, although Romania has received EUR 45 billion in European funds in 11 years of EU membership, it is still far from Europe’s strong economies. That is why we must not accept cuts in the cohesion funds, the policy must continue at least by 2027.
Cutting funds for agriculture can also jeopardize two of the great advantages the European Union has brought us in its 70 years of existence: guaranteeing food security in the Union and giving Europeans access to quality food.
The European Commission will have to answer these questions in the next period, especially since the experience of the current budgetary programming period shows us that the final outcome of the negotiations with the governments of member states on the multiannual budget leads to lower allocations than stipulated in the Commission’s initial proposal.
The reason is that only the governments of the member states that decide by unanimity are involved in these negotiations, and the European Parliament is only called to endorse or reject the outcome of these negotiations. And since big contributors to the EU budget will want to make extra savings, we risk obtaining a result even worse than the European Commission’s proposal.
The European Parliament has asked for an ambitious proposal from the Commission. In the report we adopted in the March plenary session, the Parliament called for a 1.3% increase in the Gross National Income of all member states. Currently, this level is 1% of GNI. Thus, I will struggle for the final version of the budget to be as close as possible to the proposal I voted in March.
Linking European funds to compliance with rule of law, an alarm signal for PSD – ALDE government
Another proposal of the Commission with which I do not entirely agree, but which must raise questions to the PSD-ALDE government is the correlation between European funds allocations to rule of law.
The Commission has therefore proposed a mechanism for countries that violate fundamental EU principles, such as the rule of law, to risk the cancellation of payments from European funds; At the same time, though, authorities will be required to pay the money to end beneficiaries. I do not agree with approaches that in the end penalize the beneficiary of European funds – the farmer, the small and medium-sized enterprises, etc.
Governors must be the only ones to pay for governors’ mistakes. We see how the PSD-ALDE government has made a priority of attacking the rule of law and trying to get the hands on the judiciary by modifying the laws and forcing the resignation of the chief prosecutor of DNA. So, in this context, the message sent by the Commission is clear: attacks on the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law pose a risk to the European funds.
Good things: Increasing allocarions for research and Erasmus+ Program
However, to present the positive aspects of the Commission’s proposal, it should be noted that according to yesterday’s proposal, the Erasmus+ Program, the most successful European program, will have a doubled allocation and the research program budget will be increased by 30%. Other areas of targeted growth are security, defense and migration.
For example, EUR 27.5 billion will be allocated to security and defense, and EUR 34.9 billion to border management and migration. Last but not least, it is proposed a significant increase in allocations to EU external action to EUR 123 billion – 26% more than now. All these measures will make life easier for citizens in the European Union.
It is also proposed a stand-alone program to fund free one-month train tickets for young people aged 18 years, to visit Europe. This program is the continuation of the one we approved in the 2018 EU budget for which I was the Chief Negotiator of the European Parliament. It is a project to which I am very much committed, and I will struggle to see this European Commission’s proposal in the final version of the budget.
What Romania should do and what to do
There will be tough negotiations between two parties that have already emerged at the European level: those who want a budget even lower than in the Commission’s proposal (northern states, the Netherlands, Austria) and those who will try to maintain allocations at least at the present level (Poland, Romania, Spain, Italy).
The objective assumed by Jean-Claude Juncker, the European Commission’s President is to agree on a future multiannual budget at the Spring European Council Summit in spring 2019, to be held in Sibiu.
It would be a good opportunity for Romania, during the presidency of the EU Council that it will hold in the first half of next year, to have a budget agreement, and not any budget, but a good one for our country without the cuts that the Commission proposed yesterday.
But to achieve this goal, it is a lot of work to do. The Government must first demonstrate that the allocation of amounts similar to those existing at present is rational and based on a high absorption rate. That is why authorities need to speed up the implementation of projects with European funding and increase their visibility.
Secondly, we must, if necessary, take on some new conditions to keep our allocations. These conditions may take the form of some macroeconomic, fiscal and economic sustainability criteria – criteria that will, ultimately, be useful to Romania, and will even more protect citizens from irresponsible politicians who waste public money.
Thirdly, we need to establish a system of alliances with the countries benefiting from the cohesion policy, to have answers, counter-arguments to states that want to reduce these policies and negotiate as efficiently as possible. In the end, the future budget is decided by unanimity, so it cannot be adopted without Romania.
Our country needs to identify those files where it could make concessions to get more gains in the next multiannual budget. The strategic question that Romanian authorities must answer is: what conditionalities do we accept to receive as many funds as possible?
It is important to start negotiating on a strong, credible position, but also be aware that reaching unanimity is done only based on a compromise.I, in the European Parliament, shall continue to promote a strengthened budget that would ensure a balance between the EU’s traditional policies, such as cohesion and agriculture, and the emerging ones that do not affect Romania’s interests.
To offer predictability to the European fund recipients, it is important for us to adopt the next multiannual budget as early as possible so that to be in force as of January 1, 2021, and beneficiaries to be able to absorb the funds.
Lăsați un comentariu
The Ministry of Public Finance makes a "comparative analysis" of the Tax Code and the Tax Procedure Code with a view to applying a new… Mai mult›
Romania, Hungary and Slovenia are the member states that recorded the largest increase in the share of public sector employees in the total number of… Mai mult›
Fitch confirms Romania's rating at BBB- but warns: fiscal loosening is risky for macroeconomic stability
Fitch Ratings confirmed on Friday Romania's rating for long-term foreign and local currency debt at BBB-, with a stable outlook, but warned that fiscal loosening… Mai mult›
Finance Minister Eugen Teodorovici said at a press conference held in Bistrita that "a mechanism of this type is in progress”, a mechanism on tax… Mai mult›
AOAR - Economy against new Criminal Code: businessmen denounce excessive protection provided to officials who cause damages to economy
The Businessmen’s Association of Romania (AOAR) asks the ruling coalition to explain the mechanism by which, after changes introduced on Wednesday in the Criminal Code,… Mai mult›
Number of insolvencies increased by 12% in first five months. Suspended activities - plus 31%, dissolutions - plus 59%
The increase in the number of companies and PFAs in insolvency was 11.97% in the first five months of this year, compared to the same… Mai mult›
The investment needs in Romania's transport infrastructure exceed EUR 70 billion, while the available resources by 2030 are EUR 36 billion, according to the Transport… Mai mult›
Liviu Dragnea announces a dictatorship through ordinances: "Correct procedural approach through Parliament is wrong, from the law on investment fund to laws on the judiciary. We will be firmer and more radical"
"We decided to be much firmer and more radical. My way of having a correct procedural approach in the Parliament proved wrong. In the Parliament,… Mai mult›
Deputies adopted a draft law on Wednesday whereby entitlement to social assistance ceases when a job is refused. The decision, Agerpres announced, was taken with… Mai mult›
The National Agency for Employment (ANOFM) grants subsidies of RON 900/month to employers who employ graduates of educational institutions, with contracts of indefinite duration, within… Mai mult›
C.P. Tariceanu, before the heads of Senates from EU: The European Commission has encouraged the parallel state, in Romania it is like in the 50's
Calin Popescu Tariceanu (foto) delivered a very tough speech on Friday, in the Senate, addressed to the European Commission, which he accused of encouraging the… Mai mult›
The National Bank of Romania (BNR) sent to banks for consultation a draft amending Regulation 17/2012, which provides for a consistent lowering of the indebtedness… Mai mult›
Senators adopted on Wednesday the draft for amending the Code of Criminal Procedure, by 74 votes for to 28, against. The bill goes to the… Mai mult›
RBL: Workforce crisis is worse than economic crisis - 3.4 million Romanians have left the country in last 10 years
Migration is one of the most serious problems facing Romania at this time, along with the lack of infrastructure. However, the return of Romanians to… Mai mult›