The deterioration of investors’ confidence in emerging economies and the default risk of loans to companies and population are the biggest risks to financial stability… Mai mult›
A (new) paradox: Public debt decreases as a share of GDP – cost increases with interest to what we borrow. Remarks
Although medium- and long-term foreign debt (DETML) has declined steadily over the last four years related to GDP, the amount paid for this debt has… Mai mult›
The current account of the balance of payments registered a deficit of EUR 2,053 million in the first four months of this year, about 15%… Mai mult›
We and Juncker Plan: Bulgaria – 3rd position, Romania – 23rd position. How other neighbours are doing
The value and economic impact of the Romanian projects to attract resources from the so-called “Juncker Plan” of European investments are much lower, compared to… Mai mult›
The voting machine of the Chamber of Deputies (decision chamber) approved on Wednesday – 174 votes for, 98 against and 3 abstentions – the Law… Mai mult›
de Marin Pana 12.12.2016
In terms of economic balances, we rank 2nd, tied with Poland and behind the Czech Republic, the only country that successfully met all the requirements imposed by the procedure for macroeconomic imbalance.
The Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP) is a supervisory mechanism aimed at early identifying the risks of macroeconomic instability in a country and correcting them. Precisely the stable position that we hardly won in the recent years by meeting almost all criteria required made us attractive, beyond the well-known deficiencies that we have in infrastructure and the functioning of the business environment.
First, a few technical explanations
The scoreboard that initially included ten indicators considered essential to describe the evolution of a national economy. They increased later to 11 and currently there are 14 performance criteria used for warning on potential problems; problems that might underlie a move to a more thorough analysis for the states where that is a need.
Besides the preventive side, MIP also comprises a corrective aspect translated into the Excessive Imbalance Procedure. Under this procedure, there is a series of gradual measures taken for bringing the key indicators within the accepted limits and they might extend to applying sanctions to the Eurozone countries, if they repeatedly violate the recommendations.
The mechanism for monitoring the potential macroeconomic issues has been established in December 2011 as part of the so-called “six-pack” package. It is noted that the assessment of whether a country falls within the limits set is based on an analysis that takes into account the correlations of the moment, by separating between the benign slippages and those having potential to escalate and cause systemic shortcomings.
The European Commission can approve preventive recommendations to the member states, in accordance with Article 121.2 of the EU Treaty even in the early stage of the imbalances, before they develop. Recommendations can be made at the end of May each year in the context of the so-called European Semester for coordinating the economic and budgetary policies at the EU level.
A member state that falls under the macroeconomic imbalance procedure must submit a corrective action plan comprising clear objectives and deadlines. The implementation of this plan will be monitored and recorded by regular reports. A first failure in achieving the objectives is to be sanctioned by opening an interest bearing deposit that can turn into a fine.
What the scoreboard indicators are and how many countries are within the limits required
The 14 indicators initially set for the scoreboard refer to:
- External and competitiveness imbalances:
- The average current account balance of the past 3 years (allowed values between -4% of GDP and + 6% of GDP)
Noteworthy is that 5 countries do not comply with this criterion, but three of them because they have a too large surplus from the foreign trade (Netherlands with + 9.1%; Denmark, with + 8.8% and Germany with +7.5%). On the opposite side are the UK with -4.8% and Cyprus with -4.1%. Romania registered -1%.
- Net international investment position (liability stock below 35% of GDP)
No fewer than 15 EU countries fail to meet this criterion, because of the substantial foreign investment and their own relatively low investment in other countries, including Romania (-51.9%). This is the criterion where the Czech Republic narrowly surpassed us, a country that reached -30.7%, while Poland is a little weaker though than us, with -62.8%.
- Change of the effective real exchange rate in the last three years compared to 42 foreign trade partner countries (between -5% and + 5% for the Eurozone and between -11% and + 11% for the rest of the EU member states)
Five countries fell outside the required limits, including the UK that exceeded a little the limit with + 11.3%, but the pound devalued in the meantime, and Estonia with + 6.4%. At this criterion, Romania has an optimum level of + 2.7%, while the other 16 countries that met the criterion were within the negative range.
- The share of country exports in the world exports to not decrease by more than 6% in the last five years
Surprisingly, 11 EU member states have not passed this criterion (including Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden and Finland, which marked a value of -20.5%, almost identical to the red flashlight Greece, with -20.6 %). Romania is again very well, with + 21.1%, which would be the best performance in the EU if we excluded Ireland’s statistical adventures, of little relevance, and a mini-country as Luxembourg. Maybe we should be more attentive to this aspect, to value correctly what brought us out of the crisis and recalibrate again the growth from the domestic toward the foreign markets.
- Nominal unitary costs of workforce (expressed as a ratio between the average pay of an employee and real GDP divided by the number of employed people) to not increase by more than 9%, for the Eurozone countries, and 12% for the rest of the EU members, over the last 3 years.
Only four countries have not done their homework at this chapter, namely the Baltics and our Bulgarian neighbours, accidentally or not all of them being connected to the euro currency as fixed baseline. Unfortunately, although we took a correct decision at the time of the crisis in 1997 – 1998 for the controlled leu floating regime, it seems that now we want to jeopardize this indicator through the populist measures adopted lately.
- Internal imbalances:
- Real increase of housing prices (below 6% per year)
Six EU countries fail to meet this criterion, the highest increases being registered in Sweden somewhat naturally, by 12.0%, but carefully, also at our Hungarian neighbours, by + 11.6%. We are for now at + 1.7%, but the increased revenues of the households could change the situation quite quickly.
- Private flow of credit, consolidated (below 14% of GDP)
Only Luxembourg does not fit this criterion and we are at + 0.2%.
- Private sector debt (allowed level of below 160% of GDP)
13 countries do not fall under this level and the private sector’s over-indebtedness is obvious in many Western economies, including France, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Finland. Romania is at 59.1%.
- Public debt (below 60% of GDP)
With 37.9% based on the European methodology, we are apparently well at a criterion that raises the biggest problems in the EU. No fewer than 17 states do not meet the requirements, including Germany, with 71.2%, despite the efforts made in the recent years to reduce public debt against a background of a current account surplus of over seven percent of which we can only dream. Therefore, we should hold on this asset that we have, but that would require a budget deficit of maximum 1.8% of GDP (according to the EU estimates) to not unleash the increase of public debt.
- Average unemployment rate (recent three-year average below 10%)
12 states do not fall under this threshold, while we are at a reasonable 6.9%.
- Total liabilities of the financial sector, non-consolidated (change from the previous year below 16.5%)
All EU countries meet this criterion, even Greece, at a pinch. We are at + 4.1%.
- Employment indicators
- Total activity rate for people aged between 15-64 (3-year change below -0.2%)
The situation based on this criterion also looks good across all member states, with Romania being at a fair level of + 1.3%.
- Long term unemployment, as% of active population aged between 15-74 (3-year change below 0.5%)
7 member states do not comply with this requirement. Romania is on a stationary position with 0%.
- Youth unemployment, as% of active population aged between 15-24 years (3-year change below 2%)
Only 3 countries do not fit with Italy and Cyprus having an increase by about 5 percent, and the surprising occurrence of Finland (+ 3.4%). As for us, although we meet (yet) this criterion, the figures from the previous two criteria explain the minus 0.9 percent that illustrates the evolution for the future in terms of economic growth and higher pensions for the elderly.
Situation of the EU countries based on the requirements of the macroeconomic scoreboard:
- 14 of 14 – the Czech Republic
- 13 of 14 – Romania, Poland
- 12 of 14 – Germany, Slovenia, Slovakia
- 11 of 14 – Austria, Sweden, Luxembourg, Malta, Croatia, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania
- 10 of 14 – France, Spain, Portugal, UK, Denmark, Estonia, Hungary
- 9 of 14 – Italy, Belgium, Holland, Finland
- 8 of 14 – Ireland *, Greece
- 5 of 14 – Cyprus
* Eurostat discount data on IrelandAltogether, we marked a very good evolution in 2015 and we should keep these balances at all costs to a level that would make us attractive for investment and support a long-term robust growth.
Unfortunately, given a partially incompetent political establishment, partially irresponsible, we move – because of the populist measures taken last year and this year – towards reactivating certain imbalances that can put us out of the path.
Lăsați un comentariu
The National Agency for Employment (ANOFM) grants subsidies of RON 900/month to employers who employ graduates of educational institutions, with contracts of indefinite duration, within… Mai mult›
C.P. Tariceanu, before the heads of Senates from EU: The European Commission has encouraged the parallel state, in Romania it is like in the 50's
Calin Popescu Tariceanu (foto) delivered a very tough speech on Friday, in the Senate, addressed to the European Commission, which he accused of encouraging the… Mai mult›
The National Bank of Romania (BNR) sent to banks for consultation a draft amending Regulation 17/2012, which provides for a consistent lowering of the indebtedness… Mai mult›
Senators adopted on Wednesday the draft for amending the Code of Criminal Procedure, by 74 votes for to 28, against. The bill goes to the… Mai mult›
RBL: Workforce crisis is worse than economic crisis - 3.4 million Romanians have left the country in last 10 years
Migration is one of the most serious problems facing Romania at this time, along with the lack of infrastructure. However, the return of Romanians to… Mai mult›
Romania's economy could grow by 5.1% in 2018, according to the World Bank summer forecast. The estimate has been improved by 0.6 percentage points above… Mai mult›
Ministry of Energy: Natural gas from Black Sea will be exported through Onesti - Isaccea - Negru Voda network
The Ministry of Energy issued for Transgaz the construction permit for the consolidation of the transport system between Onesti (Bacau) and Isaccea (Tulcea) and for… Mai mult›
Romania reached 56% of the EU's average energy productivity in 2016, compared to only 43% in the year of the accession, according to data released… Mai mult›
Document / Public procurement - Changes made by OUG: how to calculate guarantees, values over which contract must be publicly announced, how to change contract without resuming procedures
Under the promise of reducing bureaucracy and increasing efficiency in the public procurement procedure, the Government approved on Thursday an emergency ordinance that brings essential… Mai mult›
The consistency of the measures needed to encourage public and private investment, as well as proposals for the development of the four major areas considered… Mai mult›
"We are pulling ourselves out of maps!": Business community’s solutions for infrastructure development
In the medium and long term, companies in Romania lose business because of disarticulated infrastructure; the country overall loses new investment, the state budget loses… Mai mult›
New Romania’s Agent at the EU Court of Justice: 32 years old, failed exams, a person supported by Olguta Vasilescu
The government agent at the EU Court of Justice, Razvan Horatiu Radu, was replaced by the Government by a decision of Prime Minister Viorica Dancila… Mai mult›
The European Commission asks Romania to urgently align the system of taxes collected on the car registration to the European one. The request is announced… Mai mult›
CCR President in a visit to Russia, despite that Ministry of Foreign Affairs has recommended not to make this visit
CCR President Valer Dorneanu is in Russia today, where he attends the Sankt Petersburg International Legal Forum, despite that MAE has recommended not to make… Mai mult›
List of black payments / Corruption in health sectors: Bribes - 25% of contract value, higher than in other fields
Romania is the European country with the lowest spending in the health sector. However, DNA statistics show that the bribe in this field is higher… Mai mult›