On Thursday, the appointed Prime Minister, Ludovic Orban, presented to colleagues from the National Office the document that he will submit to the Parliament, which… Mai mult›
Ranking of discernment: Spectacular increase in August in the difference between Romania’s other EU countries’ borrowing costs
The long-term interest rate fell below zero in the Eurozone and dropped to only 0.28% on average at the EU level, half as compared to… Mai mult›
Tourism balance drops to minus 36%, despite billions of public money that Government pumped into the market
Net costs for the state with holiday vouchers for public sector employees and the VAT cut for tourism will amount to RON 1,878 million in… Mai mult›
In this last article from the series devoted to the analysis of the quantitative easing performed by the European Central Bank (ECB), we will deal… Mai mult›
In this second article of the series dedicated to the analysis of the quantitative easing performed by the European Central Bank (ECB), we will focus… Mai mult›
de Marin Pana , 11.12.2017
The first time it happens, the second time it can be a coincidence but for the third time it is already confirmed the establishment of a strategy that can only lead to draining the public finances and exposing us to external risks that can materialize at any time as there is no room for manoeuvre (2.97% of GDP deficit planned!), no money reserve that is not already planned for consumption.
“For 2016 and 2017, policies adopted and those that are intended – a combination of massive reductions in taxes and wages – will push the tax deficit close to 3% of GDP in 2016 (which accurately proved to be true, despite the level of 2.41% of GDP announced by the Ministry of Finance as operative data for the 12 months implementation – editor’s note) and above this level in 2017 (we look forward to seeing what Eurostat will announce next spring and not the value which will be officially communicated at the end of January – editor’s note) unless compensatory measures are identified or capital expenditures are again incompletely implemented,” said a press release signed by Andrea Schaechter, Head of the IMF Mission in Romania, in October 2015 (Agerpres). At that time, the Fiscal Council showed that “the budgetary slippage that will emerge in the coming years will largely reverse the tax consolidation (otherwise suboptimal in many respects) achieved with great social, economic and political costs during the crisis.”
Three issues in draft budget
- The data on which the 2018 draft budget has been built are exactly those in the CNP autumn forecast. Data in which the exchange rate appeared at a stupefying 4.55 lei/euro, which would imply a hardly reasoned appreciation of the national currency compared to the current level of the euro/leu exchange rate.
It is noteworthy, however, that the annual value of GDP in billions of euros is missing for the first time, after several years when it was usual to be mentioned in the table presented by the National Prognosis Commission. Including in the preliminary version of the autumn forecast (where the value of 4.55 lei/euro appeared), a GDP of 198.2 billion euros has been mentioned. Within a few weeks, this value disappeared from the table and only the value in lei remained, of 907.9 billion.
- The second big question mark about the budgetary construction for 2018 is raised by the inflation data. Annual average inflation, the key input data, is clearly stated at 3.1% at the beginning of the draft budget. Those who drafted the table that opens the presentation of the implementation foresees for 2018 appear to have been ignorant of the BNR Report on inflation. An institution that deals right with this topic, the stability of prices.
Let’s see how the central bank’s estimate looks:
Maybe some specialist from the Finance Ministry can explain how an average value of 3.1% can be obtained with the quarterly inflation values mentioned above. Or why they persisted in using an estimate that CNP made long ago, according to which, at the end of 2018, inflation would be only 2.6% and not 3.2%, the level resulted from the BNR analysis.
- The third problem of the budget is that Romania does not look much like a European country in terms of revenue share in GDP. The relatively low level of the budget revenue as a share of GDP (about 70% of the EU average) makes the deficit of 3% of GDP represent a difference of almost 10% between revenues and expenditures.
That is, much higher than the approximately 6% that a typical EU budget structure would have given us the right to have, at the EU level, where budget revenues are about 45% of GDP.
Even if, in relation to GDP, our deficit seems to be the same, we are allocating in fact too much for consumption (compared to the European standards) in relation to the revenue collected.
All in all, the 2018 draft budget should be revised here and there, in the key points, if we want to be credible in the implementation and preserve macroeconomic balances. In Romanian being said, to measure better the cloth and cut our coat according to that, not to what we are willing to, for various reasons.