SIMILAR ARTICLES

How much of public investment represent European cohesion funds: a situation at EU level with Romania in the list

One of the major struggles regarding the next EU Multiannual Financial Framework refers to the level of cohesion funds to be allocated to member countries… Mai mult

Romania’s debt costs: Yield of government bonds compared to countries in the region

The yield of long-term Romanian government bonds was 4.28% in January 2020, according to Eurostat data. That is well above all the other states of… Mai mult

Reversed trend in mutual funds: Romanians invested more money than they withdrew. They look for funds with government bonds

Net subscriptions in Romanian mutual funds (the difference between invested and withdrawn amounts) became again positive in 2019 after they had been negative in 2018.… Mai mult

Romgaz has started exploitation of richest onshore gas deposits discovered in 30 years

Romgaz (SNG) announced the start of production in the deep area of Caragele deposit (Buzau), the biggest discovered in the last 30 years and one… Mai mult

4.9% – Romania’s spectacular public deficit in Q3. 2 times more than anyone else in the EU

Romania managed again to stand out at the EU level by recording the highest level of the public deficit in the third quarter of 2019,… Mai mult

Cronicile

Transferring contributions: hidden issues and official mythology

de Marin Pana 25.9.2017

The discussion on transferring wage contributions, which under the current system are partly paid by the employee and partly by the employer, fully to the employee’s responsibility has much wider connotations and little publicly discussed.

Let’s just give two examples, the first of which secretly affects the employee’s income, and the second one, for symmetry and compliance, the employer’s costs. Both being in the position of taxpayers to the budget of the law-making and law-changing state in search of more money for the budget. In fact, the purpose of the entire change in the tax payment.

1.The personal deduction of 300 lei for a gross income below 1,500 lei would be reduced by raising the gross amount to the level of 1,750 lei announced by the Labour Minister, to the former amount of 250 lei, which would negatively affect the net income. Apparently only a beneficiary of the income tax rate decrease from 16% to 10%. Obviously, the higher the wages, the larger the lessening effect on the personal deduction and the more affected the net income.

But the limits in the application of personal deductions (regressive and by the way why regressive and not fixed?), will they be maintained between 1,500 lei and 3,000 lei, despite the increase in salaries over the last ten years (the limit of 3,000 lei was fixed then)?

2. What about the 0.85% of the gross wage applied for medical leave and social security benefits (abbreviated FNUASS), the 0.4% for the risk and accidents fund and the wage claims fund (0.25% of the gross salary)? In total, 22 lei (12 lei + 6 lei + 4 lei) now paid by the employer, besides the much-known pension contribution (15.8% for normal conditions), health contribution (5.2%) and unemployment (0.5%). What will be the quotas “forgotten” in the public debate and will they apply to the new increased gross wage, with the consequent effects regarding the increase of the wage costs?

To those who do not want to be taken for a fool by this tv presentation approach, by one side or the other, depending on the political position and trade union fears, let’s put some order in a few statements and then we shall leave you the pleasure of deciding by yourself what will happen.

So, the decrease from 39.25% to 35% of total contributions paid to the budget from the work done is a joke, more or less good. That is because 35% of the potential new reference gross wage of RON 1,750 means 612 lei representing the tax compared to 39.25% of the current reference minimum gross wage of 1.450 lei, which means only 569 lei representing the tax. Or 43 lei less per employee calculated for the minimum national wage.

But how does the employee’s net wage remain untouched? By lowering the tax rate from 16% to 10%, the state will take less from the income tax by about the amount it will collect additionally from the contributions (for the non-payment of which it will put the private employers under the criminal law). Therefore, it is perfectly possible for the employee not to lose anything from the net wage (some lei above or below will not make a real difference).

However, the thing with the increase of future pensions due to the increase of contributions does NOT work. Although the amounts collected by the state will be higher, they will be equally “higher” for all employees, which means they will not change the ratio between them, namely the score considered when establishing the pension. Which is based on the score and not the contribution but this is a separate topic, which deserves a special separate space.

In fact, all this move is aimed at increasing the amounts collected to the budget for the recently, hazardously increased pensions, unsustainable on mid and long-term anyway. At the same time, the subsidies from the state budget would be reduced and the budget will anyway lose on the income tax side, which will not improve the public deficit that is steadily heading above the allowed level of 3% of GDP.

But the nicest thing, which almost nobody seemed to notice, is the GENERALIZED decrease of the income tax from 16% to 10%. That will massively favour those with the highest incomes and deepen the record gap within the EU between the richest and the poorest at the national level. Where we register a record ratio of 8.2, about double the European average.

Perhaps, instead of measures to “optimize” the budget by a curious left-right wing mix, aimed at attracting the crowd’s votes for the benefit of a small group (sounds like South America, right?), it would be more useful to increase, to the benefit of the middle class (if you still remember what the phrase means) and following the European model, the standard tax rates and SIMULTANEOUSLY introduce more consistent and justified tax deductions.

It seems counterintuitive and may sound like hell from the political perspective to raise taxes (if you are to take social commitments without having the money you need) but leaving some significant GENERALIZED deductions would benefit those who earn small and medium incomes and the ability of the state to implement social policies through appropriate tax policies. Based on which to reach EFFICIENT TAX RATES such as 10% only for those who need them or help the economic growth.

Mergeți în homepage ›

Publicat la data de 25.9.2017

Lăsați un comentariu


NEWS

Shareholders of Galati steel plant promise investments of one billion euros

GFG Alliance has committed to invest one billion euros to upgrade Galati steel plant in order to reduce emissions and increase production. Another EUR 1… Mai mult

Transport Ministry announces it has sent to Brussels the financing request for Sibiu - Pitesti highway

The Transport Ministry, as the Intermediate Body in Transport, approved the financing request for the project "Construction of Sibiu - Pitesti highway", Sections 1, 4… Mai mult

Romania and Juncker Plan: EUR 720 million attracted, of which 35% by Transgaz for BRUA

(The map of investment financed through Juncker Plan, by GDP share. Darker colours mean higher shares) The operator of national natural gas pipelines, Transgaz (TGN)… Mai mult

Top 3 reasons why young people leave Romania

Lack of trust in authorities, corruption and low living standards are the main reasons why young people leave Romania. The data is part of a… Mai mult

IMM Invest Romania – program implementing rules have been published

The Ministry of Public Finance announces that it has issued the methodological norms for the implementation of the Program for supporting small and medium-sized enterprises… Mai mult

Pollution import and car park expansion: comparisons with the other EU states

Romania is the EU country with the fewest cars in terms of the number of inhabitants, according to data recently published by Eurostat. We appear… Mai mult

Government is trying to save budget deficit: reductions in public administration system, cancellation of bonus for harmful conditions, excise duty on soft drinks

The Government is preparing the public for the first measures aimed at avoiding the budget slippage, which would be applied by the PSD-ALDE government. News… Mai mult

Laura Codruta Kovesi remains alone in the race for European Chief Prosecutor

French Prosecutor Jean-Francois Bohnert will be appointed as head of the European Financial Prosecutor's Office, a position for which he was heard on Thursday, 11… Mai mult

Romania - EU country with highest risk of dying in a road accident, Bulgaria is quickly decreasing number of victims since it built motorways

Romania recorded the highest road deaths in the EU also last year, with 96 deaths per one million inhabitants in 2018, almost double the EU… Mai mult

Latest developments in progress at Health Ministry: Differentiated wages based on performance, competitions organised at a regional level not by hospitals

Sorina Pintea announced on Thursday further new changes that will be brought to the functioning of the health care system, including new rules for employment… Mai mult

ANAF changes selection procedure for liquidators. Main changes

The new order on approval and selection procedures for insolvency practitioners is an important step to a very good direction, industry experts say. ANAF is… Mai mult

Romania loses competition for a seat at UN Security Council. MAE Excuse: Campaign started too late

Romania lost to Estonia in the final vote to get the non-permanent member position within the UN Security Council for the period 2020-2021. On Friday,… Mai mult

Business internationalization / eMAG makes a step to entry five new international markets and targets a business of EUR 2 billion

eMAG hopes to get the opinion of the Hungarian Competition Council over the next two months for the acquisition of Extreme Digital, the market leader… Mai mult


-->