The general consolidated budget registered in the first half of the current year a deficit of about RON 45 billion, equivalent to 4.2% of the… Mai mult›
Siegfried Muresan: The EU is considering the possibility to introduce several types of taxes. The only one on which there is agreement is the one on plastic
At the European level, there is an agreement to introduce a “modest” tax on disposable plastic, a first source of income to support the repayment… Mai mult›
Long-term interest rate fell below 4%. However, a courageous change of economic vision would be required
Long-term interest rate for Romania fell by almost one percentage point in just two months, according to data released by Eurostat. After increasing up to… Mai mult›
Budgetary and institutions’ operational constraints generated by the pandemic have subjected the Romanian tax system to significant tensions, which proved its limits, notes the international… Mai mult›
Some facts – or what we call “Hypothesis” in Mathematics * What EU is in the global economic and technological competition * The sex of… Mai mult›
de Marin Pana 10.7.2017
Romania ranks 75th in the world according to the United Nations E–Government Development Index for 2016 and belongs to the “Neophytes Cluster” at this crucial chapter for public administration, according to an OECD report. That is the organization which brings together the most developed economies in the world and to which we have applied for accession. That is, we should prove to this organization that we deserve to join a select club. Including by bringing the management of public data to the efficiency level corresponding to 2017.
But the very suggestive graphs presented in the OECD report show a still long way to go for us, both in terms of the level of digitization of public information and the penetration, compared to the EU average and clearly below reference countries for our level of development, such as Portugal, Greece, Hungary, the Czech Republic or Slovakia (see graphs).
Moreover, the evolution of the E-governance Index has been worsening, with declining results in all the evaluations made (every two years) since 2010. With the specialists mentioning that Romania has not stopped making progress, but other countries had a faster advance than us and went ahead.
Therefore, the National Strategy on the Digital Agenda for Romania, set in 2015 and appreciated as very good in theory, is weak in terms of the rhythm of implementing its provisions. The commitment is a strong one, which is confirmed at the organizational level by establishing a Government Chief Information Officer, but the delimitation of tasks in relation to the Ministry of Communications, to avoid overlapping or leaving some problems out, is not clear enough.
Last but not least, the following issues from the OECD report should also be retained:
Although the progress in delivering digital services is visible in some sectors, such as the IT system of the Ministry of Finance, the national health insurance card and the relaunch of the “e-guvernare.ro” portal, a key challenge remains the change from a fragmented to a better-articulated approach of different aspects faced by citizens in their relationship with the state.
The consistency and the clarity in the use of different public websites should be substantially improved, and the concepts mentioned in the report are the development of humanised platforms and the upgrade based on the experience of the interaction with the companies and citizens. Ideas that may seem abstract, but have a much clearer impact on the time allocated, the productivity, and the money lost.