How much of public investment represent European cohesion funds: a situation at EU level with Romania in the list

One of the major struggles regarding the next EU Multiannual Financial Framework refers to the level of cohesion funds to be allocated to member countries… Mai mult

Romania’s debt costs: Yield of government bonds compared to countries in the region

The yield of long-term Romanian government bonds was 4.28% in January 2020, according to Eurostat data. That is well above all the other states of… Mai mult

Reversed trend in mutual funds: Romanians invested more money than they withdrew. They look for funds with government bonds

Net subscriptions in Romanian mutual funds (the difference between invested and withdrawn amounts) became again positive in 2019 after they had been negative in 2018.… Mai mult

Romgaz has started exploitation of richest onshore gas deposits discovered in 30 years

Romgaz (SNG) announced the start of production in the deep area of Caragele deposit (Buzau), the biggest discovered in the last 30 years and one… Mai mult

4.9% – Romania’s spectacular public deficit in Q3. 2 times more than anyone else in the EU

Romania managed again to stand out at the EU level by recording the highest level of the public deficit in the third quarter of 2019,… Mai mult


Adventure of an ultra- politicized state with sovereign investment fund: FSDI – under economists’ magnifying glass

de Adrian N Ionescu 31.7.2017

The available drafts on the establishment of the Sovereign Development and Investment Fund (FSDI) do not specify the strategy, objectives, management mechanisms or the control mode of the FSDI, the economists asked by warn.

These drafts give the Fund the status of one of the largest corporate powers in Romania, with the exemption from several legal provisions.

“The reading of the draft law on the FSDI establishment and the memorandum of association does not explain anything about the objectives and the financial functioning of the Fund.

All the details presented (…) are irrelevant if one cannot understand the financial logic of the Fund’s operation,” says Aurelian Dochia, an experienced economist in the financial field.

The documents mentioned state that the FSDI will be funded from resources that currently go directly into the state accounts, but do not say how it will make the profit from which it should contribute to the development of the companies from its portfolio and the establishment of other companies, as well as to large national investments.

The FSDI project shows “a concept emptied of any essence,” according to Professor Mircea Cosea (photo).

“The resources of a sovereign fund should be primarily permanent, such as the trade surplus of China, or oil revenues in Norway. This fund feeds on the profits of the companies from its portfolio, at the cost of decapitalizing them and at the risk of undermining their own investment programs,” says Mircea Cosea.

In this context, it is worrying “the subversive idea of selling shares of these companies, whose value will drop as they decapitalize,” says the expert.

The draft documents on the establishment of the FSDI do not specify either the FSDI policy on investing in the economy or on what kind of investment it will focus, the details being poorer than the promises of the government program.

Also, there are no convincing arguments provided that the authorities will fulfil through FSDI their duty to stimulate the development of the economy, according to Cornel Marian (photo), partner of Oresa Ventures, a private equity investment company that has been investing in Romania since the 1990s.

“The state should reduce, not increase its role in the economy and business. In Romania, the state should provide the infrastructure and focus on the much-delayed public investment, provide an environment favourable to business and investment, competitive at the international level, rather than look to play an active role in business and in commercial or financial operations“, says Cornel Marian.

The idea that the sovereign fund would finance the construction of motorways and hospitals is improper for an investment fund whose financial strength resulted from its own investment is not defined.

Mircea Cosea and Aurelian Dochia remind that motorways and hospitals are not profitable ways of capitalizing on resources.

A profit-oriented fund has nothing to do to with building a state hospital. Such objectives are funded from the budget,” Aurelian Dochia also says.

FSDI: Purpose and means

“FSDI aims both to develop and finance, from its own resources and attracted funds, cost-effective and sustainable investment projects in various economic sectors, by direct contribution or through other investment funds or companies, by itself or jointly with other institutional or private investors, as well as to manage its own financial assets, to obtain profit,” says the draft memorandum of association quoted.

This is the only indication of the Fund’s strategy, copied in the memorandum of association in the draft law.

“To accomplish its main objective, FSDI can:

  • a) establish companies as sole member or in joint venture with other partners, in any company form;
  • b) participate in financing companies in which it is a shareholder by contributing to the increase of the share capital, loans or other types of financing;
  • c) sell shares from its portfolio, according to the law;
  • d) sell, acquire and maintain financial instruments in its own portfolio, in accordance with its own investment policies,” the draft memorandum of association also says.

No further details on that matter.

The definition of investment policies, as well as the resulting objectives, are left to the discretion of the Supervisory Board members, namely the entity that will represent the state – sole shareholder in the “general shareholders assembly” and will approve the respective policies.

“You do not need a sovereign fund to use the profit of companies,” remarks Mircea Cosea.

“I confess that I have never been able to understand the logic of establishing a new institution with a pompous name of “Sovereign Development and Investment Fund,” says Aurelian Dochia (photo).

The only justification for creating the Fund that I understand is the one of establishing a vehicle with the capability to borrow from the financial markets, without the loan being registered in the public debt. But this argument is also doubtful. It will be obvious to everyone that the Fund is a public entity and analysts will consider the fund’s debts as a quasi-public debt,” adds Aurelian Dochia.

Market perceptions could worsen this way the costs of financing the government debt, all the more so as state finances will no longer benefit from the dividends of its profitable companies.

Hard to understand

Aurelian Dochia summarizes the unknowns about the FSDI’s operation as follows:

  • How will FSDI provide an additional source of capital for investment in Romania?
  • Will state-owned companies improve much their performance once they are part of the Fund’s portfolio?

“Let’s be optimistic and accept that the Fund suddenly finds the magic formula that the ministries have not been able to find in so many years and the companies from the portfolio produce 5-10% more dividends. Does the situation fundamentally change with an additional 10-20-30 million euros per year? Furthermore, if the methods to improve the performance of state-owned companies are known, why are not these methods applied by ministries and agencies to which they report now?”, the economist wonders.

  • Getting a return on investment involves risks and a long wait. “FSDI could make richer, at best, the next generation. But the current promise is that its impact will be felt on the economy even in the next years.”

Control of Colossus

FSDI would take over from the authorities a substantial component of Romania’s development policy, that of stimulating the economy, especially through the large energy and transport state companies but the Romanian state does not seem ready for the adventure of a sovereign fund.

Moreover, the FSDI management risks to be politicized to the detriment of the economic rationales, according to Cornel Marian, partner of Oresa Venture private equity investment company that has been investing in Romania since the 1990s.

Our state is still weak and ravaged by corruption. Chaotic political interference and some political leaders’ desire of control often lead to appointing incompetent managers in state agencies and companies, which leads to a lack of continuity and strategic vision and to decisions taken on non-transparent criteria or with no economic sense,” says Cornel Marian.

Therefore, “in this context and moment, although the establishment of this fund may theoretically represent an opportunity to bring professionals in the management of these participations and state investments to the targeted companies, I rather expect to see, in practice, negative manifestations of this power concentration in the hands of some people appointed and periodically changed by political games,” Cornel Marian fears.

The draft law already takes care to exempt the FSDI “from the provisions of the Emergency Ordinance 109/2011 on corporate governance, approved with the subsequent amendments and completions by Law 111/2016″.

It is only said that the members of the Supervisory Board will be selected “following an own transparent and competitive procedure”. Who will decide “the own procedure”?

It is true that it is provided that “decisions on the management of the FSDI assets and liabilities are taken by the FSDI management bodies on a commercial basis, under the terms of the law and the memorandum of association, without the involvement or consent of the public authorities exercising, on behalf of the Romanian state, the rights and obligations related to the FSDI shareholder role, or of any other public authority or institution.”

However, as the founding documents of the FSDI show now, they leave entirely to the state entity that will be the sole shareholder to decide where the Fund will invest, since nothing is mentioned about the investment strategy and policies but that “the general shareholders assembly… approves the investment strategy of FSDI, which includes the performance and risk objectives to ensure the financial sustainability of FSDI, as well as the performance indicators.”

“The leadership and control manner is suspicious because it can be suspected of political use,” says Mircea Cosea.

“Romania is not in the position to have a surplus of revenues, the state budget has a deficit and this deficit is about to quickly grow! The idea that what the state cannot do now in terms of investment will be done with this miraculous investment fund is a smokescreen, an illusion that will spend again a lot of money on nothing!

“On the other hand, many people will be happy with the creation of some well-paid jobs and contracts,” concludes Aurelian Dochia.

Finally, the objectives, management, and governance of the FDSI, as outlined in the draft law on the Fund’s establishment and the memorandum of association, seem to be far from the accuracy of the “Santiago Principles” of organization, activity and conduct of sovereign funds on the market, which the governments of the 26 member countries of the International Monetary Fund that have sovereign funds agreed as early as in 2008 to observe, under the aegis of the IMF.

Mergeți în homepage ›

Publicat la data de 31.7.2017

Lăsați un comentariu


Shareholders of Galati steel plant promise investments of one billion euros

GFG Alliance has committed to invest one billion euros to upgrade Galati steel plant in order to reduce emissions and increase production. Another EUR 1… Mai mult

Transport Ministry announces it has sent to Brussels the financing request for Sibiu - Pitesti highway

The Transport Ministry, as the Intermediate Body in Transport, approved the financing request for the project "Construction of Sibiu - Pitesti highway", Sections 1, 4… Mai mult

Romania and Juncker Plan: EUR 720 million attracted, of which 35% by Transgaz for BRUA

(The map of investment financed through Juncker Plan, by GDP share. Darker colours mean higher shares) The operator of national natural gas pipelines, Transgaz (TGN)… Mai mult

Top 3 reasons why young people leave Romania

Lack of trust in authorities, corruption and low living standards are the main reasons why young people leave Romania. The data is part of a… Mai mult

IMM Invest Romania – program implementing rules have been published

The Ministry of Public Finance announces that it has issued the methodological norms for the implementation of the Program for supporting small and medium-sized enterprises… Mai mult

Pollution import and car park expansion: comparisons with the other EU states

Romania is the EU country with the fewest cars in terms of the number of inhabitants, according to data recently published by Eurostat. We appear… Mai mult

Government is trying to save budget deficit: reductions in public administration system, cancellation of bonus for harmful conditions, excise duty on soft drinks

The Government is preparing the public for the first measures aimed at avoiding the budget slippage, which would be applied by the PSD-ALDE government. News… Mai mult

Laura Codruta Kovesi remains alone in the race for European Chief Prosecutor

French Prosecutor Jean-Francois Bohnert will be appointed as head of the European Financial Prosecutor's Office, a position for which he was heard on Thursday, 11… Mai mult

Romania - EU country with highest risk of dying in a road accident, Bulgaria is quickly decreasing number of victims since it built motorways

Romania recorded the highest road deaths in the EU also last year, with 96 deaths per one million inhabitants in 2018, almost double the EU… Mai mult

Latest developments in progress at Health Ministry: Differentiated wages based on performance, competitions organised at a regional level not by hospitals

Sorina Pintea announced on Thursday further new changes that will be brought to the functioning of the health care system, including new rules for employment… Mai mult

ANAF changes selection procedure for liquidators. Main changes

The new order on approval and selection procedures for insolvency practitioners is an important step to a very good direction, industry experts say. ANAF is… Mai mult

Romania loses competition for a seat at UN Security Council. MAE Excuse: Campaign started too late

Romania lost to Estonia in the final vote to get the non-permanent member position within the UN Security Council for the period 2020-2021. On Friday,… Mai mult

Business internationalization / eMAG makes a step to entry five new international markets and targets a business of EUR 2 billion

eMAG hopes to get the opinion of the Hungarian Competition Council over the next two months for the acquisition of Extreme Digital, the market leader… Mai mult