EY barometer: Business community is more concerned about growth model and public policies than bureaucracy

Entrepreneurs and leaders of Romanian private companies are distrustful about the consumption-based economic growth model because it does not offer but a short-term perspective, according… Mai mult

Regional GDP / Good news: with over EUR40,000 / inhabitant, Bucharest surpasses Madrid, Berlin and Rome. Bad news: result of internal imbalances

According to data published by Eurostat, the living standard in the Bucharest-Ilfov region was 139% of the EU average in 2016, according to GDP per… Mai mult

A table: Structure of Romania’s government expenditure within European context

According to the Eurostat data, in 2016 Romania ranked last but two among the EU states both in terms of share of GDP allocated to… Mai mult

January 2018: Advance of purchasing power melted by the minute. REAL wage increases by sectors

The national gross average wage announced by the INS for January 2018 was 4,143 lei, a value that cannot be compared with the previous month… Mai mult

How Romania wants to shift to circular economy without recycling

Since the beginning of this year, three bags have appeared at the refuse disposal chute of the apartment block where I live. One black, another… Mai mult

UNSUSTANIABLE: Purchasing power increase, triple compared to GDP growth!

de Marin Pana 9.10.2017

UNSUSTAINABLE: Purchasing power increase, triple compared to GDP growth!

The purchasing power of wages reached the threshold of 180% in July 2017 compared to the reference set for October 1990 (last month before price liberalization). In the first half of this year, the average level reached an impressive 176.7%, from only 133.3% in the first half of 2015. It is an evolution that deserves a special attention to see if it is sustainable in time.

The discussion is about an increase in real terms of the net income earned by employees by nearly one-third over just two years (more precisely, 32.5%), THREE TIMES the cumulative level of GDP growth over the same timeframe. In this situation, paradoxically, the demands for wage increases are multiplying and becoming acuter instead of tempering on the rationales that “much will have more”.

Purchasing power is given by the ratio between the wage income growth index and the consumer price index. An increased purchasing power can only be obtained if these incomes grow faster than the prices of products and services purchased with the money earned from work.

We considered the first semester of each year following the EU accession because, in fact, decisions on economic policies related to the incomes, including and especially for the following year, were taken at about this time and based on the available statistical data according to standard procedures of information gathering, processing, and communication from the INS.

For those who have a slightly weaker memory, we remind that Romanians’ purchasing power, calculated as the average of the first semester, exceeded the threshold of 100% of the reference value set for October 1990 (the last month before the liberalization of prices) only after the EU accession.

At the same time, we also remind the episode at mid-2010 when the wage cuts, along with a five percent increase in the VAT, suddenly reduced the purchasing power of wages (from 123.7% in June 2010 to 114.9% in July 2010, which means minus eight percent month-on-month). It is worth remembering that the recovery came only four years later.


  • Evolution of purchasing power in the first half of the year (2007-2017)
  • Year    Jan      Feb      Mar      Apr      May     June    Average          Growth            GDP (H1)        vs GDP


Looking back, one can see that the decision to increase salaries after the first half of 2008 did not initially look so bad on paper, and the gap to the economic growth (otherwise a historical record) was only 4.2% in the first half of the year. That is, somewhere below half or half of the hazards from the income policy in the first semesters of 2016 and 2017.

Attention, not even in 2008, when we had an economic growth of 8.8% and not 5.0% as in 2016 or 5.7% as in 2017, they did not go so far in increasing the purchasing power (13.4% was below 15.8% in 2016 and 14.4% in 2017) as in the last two years. The major error was made with the growth measures taken for 2009.

Once applied, they could not be reversed until 2010, and they cost us our IMF agreement and the doubling of the public debt. Respectively, we are still paying year after year about 1% of GDP (more than if we did not make the mistake of excessively increasing the wages) for the debt left since then (money with which we could access every year the EU funds and build highways and schools and hospitals, etc.).

Around 2013, GDP growth was about 40% compared to 1990 and the employees’ purchasing power about + 20%. It could be said that there is a reserve of additional income over the evolution of GDP (resulting from the transfer of the burden related to the emergence from the crisis almost exclusively to the employees but this is another subject). This reserve has been exhausted.

Gross Domestic Product grew in real terms between 1990 and 2016 by 58%, while wage purchasing power increased by 59% (monthly average of last year). That is, although we are under capitalist conditions, we returned to the correlation with the possibilities given by GDP form the socialist era (that is to stop blaming the excessive exploitation of labour, unless that was not done during those times as well, logically).

What we are doing now is to force, again (after the 2008 experience, from which it seems we have learned nothing) breaking the correlation between the economic result and the remuneration of those who obtain this result. With the mention that the balance tends to favour those who do not obtain it directly (employees in the public sector) or do not contribute to it at all, in the capacity they have (pensioners).

If we look to the line of the ten correlations between the purchasing power increase and the GDP growth, we can see that the situation is not as obviously shocking as in 2009. That is when they offered extra money (only + 6.4%!), based on the decisions taken in the second half of 2008, from where they could not be given and the economy started to decline sharply.

In 2015, the increase in purchasing power was higher (+ 6.8%) than in 2009 but we did not find ourselves in a global crisis. Purchasing power was maintained at a reasonable advance relative to the GDP growth, almost three percent, only because of the underpayment reserves accumulated during the crisis.

2016 has brought a lessening of that correlation between GDP and the purchasing power (this is the correct order, because you should first have and then give from what you have). In 2017, despite the 5.8 percent GDP advance (self-sustained by forcing consumption), we started to live dangerously, far beyond the “de-correlations” presented in the last column that reached the two-digit range in the first half of 2016.

They still gave then without seriously damaging the balances in the economy. Although pushing the budget deficit from -0.8% of GDP in 2015, when we met the mid-term target and were the brightest in our class, to minus 3% of GD, which placed us among the laggards of the class, with the actual perspective of flunking, it was not okay.

Just because the correlation between GDP and the purchasing power in 2016 has resumed at a sustained pace, we could not go without major risks on the same road in 2017. The purchasing power cannot simply grow for years at a pace triple to GDP, because it is not possible, mathematically speaking, and the risks of a later downfall are major (that is why the EU asked for urgent measures for balancing the public finances).

Still less excluded is the continuation of the carnival of wage increases in 2018. A year for which some measures of salary increases in the public sector have already been announced. Correction by inflation (including via the current account deficit and the exchange rate) and the cost of increasing country’s debt are already certain. God forbid that international conditions also become unfavourable.

Mergeți în homepage ›

Publicat la data de 9.10.2017

Lăsați un comentariu


Five priorities of the Coalition for the Development of Romania presented to Dancila government

Representatives of the Coalition for the Development of Romania (CDR), an initiative of the Romanian business community coordinated since the beginning of this year by… Mai mult

Romania to host regional centre for endowment of Black Hawk helicopters for Central Europe

Romaero and American company Sikorsky, part of the Lockheed Martin group, have signed an industrial partnership agreement that will lead to the establishment of a… Mai mult

State-owned companies forced to participate in public tenders

The Government approved on Thursday a memorandum that includes a series of measures targeting publicly owned or controlled companies. Basically, the document forces the state-owned… Mai mult

Country Report - European Semester: Romania risks a tough economy landing at change of cycle, because of growth model

"In the absence of structural reforms and fiscal consolidation, Romania's strong economic growth risks creating the conditions of a tough landing," in case of a… Mai mult

Governance and Congress: Prime Minister Dancila appointed PSD Vaslui and Neamt leaders’ sons as state secretaries

Prime Minister Viorica Dancila, who is aspiring to the position of PSD executive president, promoted the sons of PSD Vaslui and Neamt presidents to government… Mai mult

Italians from Fincantieri made an offer for Mangalia Shipyard: Conditions in which they would buy 49%

The Italian group Fincantieri sent the Romanian Government an operational management offer for Mangalia Shipyard. The offer also includes the option to acquire a 49%… Mai mult

Monopoly on natural gas market in Romania: Interests supported by deputy Iulian Iancu push Romania to an open conflict with European Commission

The European Commission will sue Romania at the European Court of Justice if the Parliament in Bucharest adopts the amendments to the Emergency Ordinance 64/2016… Mai mult

AHK ”Cities of Tomorrow” – A broad view of things yet to do in Romania

As one of the first speakers, His Excellency, Ambassador Cord Meier-Klodt of the Federal Republic of Germany, while recalling the city of Munich winning a… Mai mult

Frans Timmermans in Bucharest: Stop attacking the judiciary, there is nothing wrong with it. Politicians and governors should let judiciary carry out investigations

First Vice-President of the European Commission, Frans Timmermans (photo), announced Thursday in Bucharest that he has established a direct communication line with the Parliament and… Mai mult

"Whole Romania is taking an intensive course in Law, taught by people who have interests in solving their own cases and have never graduated Law"

The President of the Supreme Court, Cristina Tarcea, said on Wednesday at the presentation of DNA’s activity report that she would like the recent attacks… Mai mult

Senate committees have approved a ceiling on interest rates on loans

The Senate committees on budget, economic and legal matters issued an admission report with amendments to the legislative proposal that amends OG 13/2011 so that… Mai mult

ANRM: OMV Petrom and ExxonMobil will increase by over 50% Romania’s production, with natural gas from Black Sea

ExxonMobil and OMV Petrom will extract 6 billion cubic meters of natural gas per year from the Neptune block in the Black Sea. Romania will… Mai mult

Justice Minister initiates procedure for dismissing Laura Kovesi. Investigation on Ordinance 13 and Belina File - among official reasons

Justice Minister Tudorel Toader announced on Thursday evening the initiation of the procedure because of "intolerable deeds in a state based on the rule of… Mai mult

A new amendment to the Tax Code: PFAs are first targeted

The Minister of Finance wants to increase the taxation of income for PFAs (self-employed person), which is now capped at the national minimum wage level.… Mai mult

"SOS" letters sent by business community to state institutions: Reform ANAF!

The member organizations of the Coalition for Romania's Development (CDR) urge the Government that the reform of ANAF should become one of the "top" priorities… Mai mult