SIMILAR ARTICLES

Three problems in 2018 budget – perseverare diabolicum

The first time it happens, the second time it can be a coincidence but for the third time it is already confirmed the establishment of… Mai mult

Draft / Employers who do not pay employees’ contributions to state budget are at risk of up to 6 years of imprisonment

The intentional non-payment of taxes and contributions due to the budget, subject to the withholding regime, will be considered a tax evasion, according to a… Mai mult

Fiscal Council, on 2018 draft budget: Deficit target depends on exceptional revenues. Overvalued revenues, undervalued expenses

The Fiscal Council published a preliminary opinion on the 2018 draft state budget on Wednesday, stating that this draft remains within the already traditional pro-cyclical… Mai mult

Real convergence – Wage purchasing power: Some comparisons with former communist countries

BNR made a thorough analysis of Romania’s status in terms of real convergence with Western economies. A precondition for adopting the euro, in line with… Mai mult

Eurozone accession in mid-term – single objective that can limit slippages in economy

Keeping the national currency under a controlled float exchange is a way to optimize the sustainable economic growth towards getting closer to the West but… Mai mult

UNSUSTANIABLE: Purchasing power increase, triple compared to GDP growth!

de Marin Pana 9.10.2017

UNSUSTAINABLE: Purchasing power increase, triple compared to GDP growth!

The purchasing power of wages reached the threshold of 180% in July 2017 compared to the reference set for October 1990 (last month before price liberalization). In the first half of this year, the average level reached an impressive 176.7%, from only 133.3% in the first half of 2015. It is an evolution that deserves a special attention to see if it is sustainable in time.

The discussion is about an increase in real terms of the net income earned by employees by nearly one-third over just two years (more precisely, 32.5%), THREE TIMES the cumulative level of GDP growth over the same timeframe. In this situation, paradoxically, the demands for wage increases are multiplying and becoming acuter instead of tempering on the rationales that “much will have more”.

Purchasing power is given by the ratio between the wage income growth index and the consumer price index. An increased purchasing power can only be obtained if these incomes grow faster than the prices of products and services purchased with the money earned from work.

We considered the first semester of each year following the EU accession because, in fact, decisions on economic policies related to the incomes, including and especially for the following year, were taken at about this time and based on the available statistical data according to standard procedures of information gathering, processing, and communication from the INS.

For those who have a slightly weaker memory, we remind that Romanians’ purchasing power, calculated as the average of the first semester, exceeded the threshold of 100% of the reference value set for October 1990 (the last month before the liberalization of prices) only after the EU accession.

At the same time, we also remind the episode at mid-2010 when the wage cuts, along with a five percent increase in the VAT, suddenly reduced the purchasing power of wages (from 123.7% in June 2010 to 114.9% in July 2010, which means minus eight percent month-on-month). It is worth remembering that the recovery came only four years later.

*

  • Evolution of purchasing power in the first half of the year (2007-2017)
  • Year    Jan      Feb      Mar      Apr      May     June    Average          Growth            GDP (H1)        vs GDP

*

Looking back, one can see that the decision to increase salaries after the first half of 2008 did not initially look so bad on paper, and the gap to the economic growth (otherwise a historical record) was only 4.2% in the first half of the year. That is, somewhere below half or half of the hazards from the income policy in the first semesters of 2016 and 2017.

Attention, not even in 2008, when we had an economic growth of 8.8% and not 5.0% as in 2016 or 5.7% as in 2017, they did not go so far in increasing the purchasing power (13.4% was below 15.8% in 2016 and 14.4% in 2017) as in the last two years. The major error was made with the growth measures taken for 2009.

Once applied, they could not be reversed until 2010, and they cost us our IMF agreement and the doubling of the public debt. Respectively, we are still paying year after year about 1% of GDP (more than if we did not make the mistake of excessively increasing the wages) for the debt left since then (money with which we could access every year the EU funds and build highways and schools and hospitals, etc.).

Around 2013, GDP growth was about 40% compared to 1990 and the employees’ purchasing power about + 20%. It could be said that there is a reserve of additional income over the evolution of GDP (resulting from the transfer of the burden related to the emergence from the crisis almost exclusively to the employees but this is another subject). This reserve has been exhausted.

Gross Domestic Product grew in real terms between 1990 and 2016 by 58%, while wage purchasing power increased by 59% (monthly average of last year). That is, although we are under capitalist conditions, we returned to the correlation with the possibilities given by GDP form the socialist era (that is to stop blaming the excessive exploitation of labour, unless that was not done during those times as well, logically).

What we are doing now is to force, again (after the 2008 experience, from which it seems we have learned nothing) breaking the correlation between the economic result and the remuneration of those who obtain this result. With the mention that the balance tends to favour those who do not obtain it directly (employees in the public sector) or do not contribute to it at all, in the capacity they have (pensioners).

If we look to the line of the ten correlations between the purchasing power increase and the GDP growth, we can see that the situation is not as obviously shocking as in 2009. That is when they offered extra money (only + 6.4%!), based on the decisions taken in the second half of 2008, from where they could not be given and the economy started to decline sharply.

In 2015, the increase in purchasing power was higher (+ 6.8%) than in 2009 but we did not find ourselves in a global crisis. Purchasing power was maintained at a reasonable advance relative to the GDP growth, almost three percent, only because of the underpayment reserves accumulated during the crisis.

2016 has brought a lessening of that correlation between GDP and the purchasing power (this is the correct order, because you should first have and then give from what you have). In 2017, despite the 5.8 percent GDP advance (self-sustained by forcing consumption), we started to live dangerously, far beyond the “de-correlations” presented in the last column that reached the two-digit range in the first half of 2016.

They still gave then without seriously damaging the balances in the economy. Although pushing the budget deficit from -0.8% of GDP in 2015, when we met the mid-term target and were the brightest in our class, to minus 3% of GD, which placed us among the laggards of the class, with the actual perspective of flunking, it was not okay.

Just because the correlation between GDP and the purchasing power in 2016 has resumed at a sustained pace, we could not go without major risks on the same road in 2017. The purchasing power cannot simply grow for years at a pace triple to GDP, because it is not possible, mathematically speaking, and the risks of a later downfall are major (that is why the EU asked for urgent measures for balancing the public finances).

Still less excluded is the continuation of the carnival of wage increases in 2018. A year for which some measures of salary increases in the public sector have already been announced. Correction by inflation (including via the current account deficit and the exchange rate) and the cost of increasing country’s debt are already certain. God forbid that international conditions also become unfavourable.

Mergeți în homepage ›

Publicat la data de 9.10.2017

Lăsați un comentariu


NEWS

Brussels offers Romania four months to take measures to correct significant deviation of structural deficit

The European Council issued on Tuesday a new recommendation, at the request of the European Commission, based on the significant deviation procedure, with Romania being… Mai mult

Eurostat: Romania had second lowest tax to GDP ratio within EU, in 2016

In Romania, the ratio between the revenues that must be collected from taxes (including social contributions - tax/GDP ratio) and GDP was 26% in 2016,… Mai mult

9 ambassadors repeat: Venice Commission's opinion is needed to amend laws on judiciary

The nine ambassadors who met on Wednesday with Minister Tudorel Toader shared their "concern over the draft laws on the reform of the judiciary discussed… Mai mult

British Vitruvian Partners bought 30% of Bitdefender

Vitruvian Partners investment fund acquired about 30% of Bitdefender from Axxess Capital and becomes the second largest shareholder in the company, valued at over USD… Mai mult

Split VAT at the Chamber of Deputies: Dilemmas of all kinds. Thresholds for outstanding payments have increased 10 times, Budget Committee to resume debates on Monday

The Budget Committee of the Chamber of Deputies has increased ten times the threshold of the outstanding VAT obligations from which companies will automatically be… Mai mult

Competition Council: Food price increase could be caused by demand excess from budget deficit

The Competition Council started an analysis, following the request of the Ministry of Agriculture, to establish the causes of the accelerated food price increase this… Mai mult

Seizure of all Liviu Dragnea's assets to recover EUR 28 million in Tel Drum case

Liviu Dragnea at the exit of the DNA headquarters where he was expected by a group of supporters and another of protesters. DNA prosecutors have… Mai mult

Rompetrol saga, chapter about money: Government asks KazMunaiGaz to pay the historical debt and demand settlement of case in court

The extension of the memorandum between the Romanian state and KazMunaiGaz, the owner of the Rompetrol Group, will be discussed only after the company's historical… Mai mult

"Not only we have not died, we rank third in the world" - Government approved second budget amendment, deficit of 2.96% of GDP

The second budget amendment this year has been adopted at the government meeting on Wednesday. As the Finance Minister assures, this amendment is "positive", the… Mai mult

Mayors: Government to offset by state budget money municipalities’ losses following tax measures

Mayors accepted on Tuesday in the negotiations with Prime Minister Mihai Tudose and several cabinet members, the promises made by the government officials to partially… Mai mult

Competition Council, "worried" that municipalities are establishing their own companies

The establishment of own companies by local administration to manage the services at the local level is worrying for the competition authority, Bogdan Chiritoiu, President… Mai mult

Draft legislation on judicial system in Parliament – to be debated as a matter of emergency

The ruling coalition registered with the Chamber of Deputies on Tuesday the draft amendments to the three important laws for the judicial system: Law 303/2004… Mai mult

Negative opinion and analysis of Fiscal Council on tax changes. "Tax package" costs 5.2 billion, not planned at all

The Fiscal Council issued a negative opinion on the proposal to amend the Fiscal Code, according to the opinion published Friday on the institution’s website.… Mai mult

Negative opinion from CES for Tax Code changes, Government meeting postponed

The Economic and Social Council, a consultative body of the Parliament and the Romanian Government, issued a negative opinion on Tudose cabinet's draft amendment to… Mai mult

Doing Business 2018: It is easier to do business in Republic of Moldova than in Romania

Romania ranks 45th in the Doing Business 2018 ranking by the World Bank (WB), with a total score of 72.87 points, right under the Republic… Mai mult